We spend over 53 hours a year in grocery stores , and if people are anything like me, a lot of that time is spent holding two similar items and trying to decide which one we should put back on the shelf. We want to make decisions that are healthy for us, and good for the environment, and we don’t want to be ripped off. What makes this all the more complicated is that a lot of labels just aren’t at all back up by science. I’ve rounded up eight labels that I find most infuriating, in the hopes it will make your next grocery store visit a little less crazy.
I recently travelled to India and went hiking in the Himalayas. While I was there I, of course, made a science video. They were not only spectacular to see, but they also have a spectacular history that dates back 130 million years. Check it out!
I spent way too long looking into data* on Nobel prizes in the sciences. I was going to make a video about it, but I think the graphs are best here in a blog post for you to look through. I wanted to see how different countries compared in terms of the number of Nobel Prizes in science (Physiology or Medicine; Chemistry; and Physics) that they won relative to things like their size and GDP. I’m not the first to do this sort of analysis.
Seven of Nine of the Nobel laureates in science this week were American (Star Trek pun-resistance was futile). Thats a lot, but, we’d also expect that for a modernized western country with hundreds of millions of people; they ought to bring home the gold. They have won 195 science Nobels so far in the history of the awards, more than any other nation, thats 0.6 prizes per million people – not bad, right? Well, it’s actually not that great. If we look at the top ten countries for ‘science prizes per person’, America comes out in… tenth place.
I’m not so surprised to see a bunch of European countries (with Switzerland at the top), some Scandinavian countries, and the USA. I should note here, I’m only evaluating countries that have won at least five prizes, otherwise the Faroe Islands would win hands down – at 20.8 prizes per million people (one of their 49 thousand residents won a Nobel prize). Ok, let’s dig a little deeper.
Let’s keep comparing these ten countries because, honestly I don’t have the time to get this data for all the countries that have won these things. What about if we sort them by gross domestic product (GDP)? After all, research is expensive!
America is still coming out on the bottom, and very little else changes.
Okay, so remember when I said I spent too much time with this data? Well, the truth is that I went through all of the hundreds of nobel laureates in science for these countries, and looked into who was born where. Turns out that these scientists do a lot of travelling around. At this point, I’ll admit, my data got a little sloppy because I didn’t realize how complicated things would be to account for (I’ll spare the details).
More than any other country on our list, prizes won by Americans were not won by people who were born there.
84 out of 195 American science laureates (43%) were not born in America. Compare that to the general rate of 13% foreign-born across the American population, and see that there is definitely something happening here. America is doing a bad job at raising Nobel prize-winning scientists, at fostering young minds. On the other hand, they are doing a really good job at the university-level, attracting top researchers from the globe more than anywhere else. Personally, I see data and it makes me think of: the awesomeness of immigrants, and for the importance of improving childhood STEM education in America.
Only four American researchers took home science-gold in foreign countries, compared with Germany at the other end of the spectrum, with a staggering 23 scientists who left Germany for Nobels elsewhere (data not shown). It seems like those countries need to teach each other how to run schools and universities.
Lastly, how focussed on science are these countries?** Well, comparing the number of science awards to total awards (including economics, literature, and peace) then curiously, Norway, Sweden, and America are the most “artsy” (somewhere someone is shaking their head reading this, ‘artsy’, pft.) and Germany is the most hardcore-science minded of our set, winning nearly nothing but SCIENCE.
Hopefully someone finds some of this interesting! I feel like a lot of it just confirms suspicions/stereotypes that I already held, but its really interesting to see that even with a small dataset like Nobel prizes (only 911 people have ever won a Nobel prize), you can see some really neat trends.
I agree with science writer Ed Yong that having Nobel prizes in science is actually just ridiculous, so I’ll leave off with a quote from Richard Feynman about the Nobel Prize that he felt shoe-horned into receiving: “I don’t see that it makes any point that someone in the Swedish academy just decides that this work is noble enough to receive a prize — I’ve already gotten the prize. The prize is the pleasure of finding a thing out, the kick in the discovery, the observation that other people use it — those are the real things. The honors are unreal to me. I don’t believe in honors.”
*This data came from lots of sifting through wikipedia, and I’m not sure my dataset is any more organized/legible than that. Still, if anyone expresses interest in it, I’d be happy to tidy it up and make it available.
** Thanks to Eric Holmes for pointing out an error I made in the final table – the percentages had gotten mixed up. Fixed now!